Epic Games has taken legal action against tech giants Google and Samsung over what it claims are efforts to block competition in app distribution on Samsung devices. The core of the lawsuit revolves around Epic’s desire to launch its own store on Android devices, allowing it to distribute games without having to pay a significant portion of revenues to Google. This move comes after Epic’s previous legal victory against Google, which found that Google’s app store practices were illegal.
The Issue with Auto Blocker Feature on Samsung Devices
One of the key points of contention in the lawsuit is Samsung’s implementation of the Auto Blocker feature on its devices. This feature, which prevents users from installing software from unapproved sources, was originally an opt-in feature when it launched in October 2023. However, shortly before the launch of the Epic Games Store on mobile, Samsung changed it to be on by default. According to Epic, the process for switching off the Auto Blocker feature is a cumbersome 21-step process, making it difficult for users to access alternative app stores.
Allegations of Collusion Between Google and Samsung
Epic alleges in the lawsuit that the decision to enable Auto Blocker by default was a coordinated effort between Google and Samsung. The lawsuit claims that Samsung has never imposed additional frictions or blocks on direct downloading or third-party stores on its devices until the implementation of the Auto Blocker feature. Epic argues that Samsung’s move to help “entrench the Play Store monopoly” only makes sense as part of a quid pro quo between the two companies.
Impact on Competition and Revenue Sharing
Epic CEO Tim Sweeney has expressed concerns that the default setting of the Auto Blocker feature on Samsung devices drives users away from third-party stores and back to the Play Store, where Google can extract its 30% cut of revenues. Sweeney highlighted the challenges of competing with Google Play and Samsung Galaxy Store’s revenue share model, which puts alternative stores at a significant disadvantage. Epic’s lawsuit seeks to level the playing field for all reputable stores and apps to compete freely.
Antitrust and Unfair Competition Claims
Epic has filed new antitrust and Unfair Competition Law claims against Google and Samsung, alleging that their actions are anti-competitive and designed to maintain Google’s monopoly power in app distribution. The lawsuit aims to challenge the agreements between Google and Samsung that prevent competition on a level playing field and restrict users’ access to alternative app stores.
Importance of Accessibility and Fair Competition
Epic’s legal action against Google and Samsung underscores the importance of accessibility and fair competition in the app distribution market. By challenging practices that inhibit competition and restrict user choice, Epic seeks to create a more open and competitive environment for developers and consumers alike. The lawsuit highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the tech industry to ensure a level playing field for all participants.
Conclusion
The legal battle between Epic Games, Google, and Samsung sheds light on the complexities of app distribution and the challenges of competing in a market dominated by tech giants. Epic’s efforts to challenge anti-competitive practices and promote fair competition are essential for fostering innovation and choice in the digital ecosystem. As the lawsuit unfolds, the outcome will have far-reaching implications for the future of app distribution and the balance of power in the tech industry.